Legal Opinion

Valley Metal Works, Inc. v. A. O. Smith-Inland, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 9, 1978No. 78-75PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant asserts, as a matter of law, that it is entitled to a mechanic’s and materialman’s lien against the property of appellee Smith. The stipulated facts are that Smith contracted by purchase order with appellee Chempro Corp. for Chempro to design and sell to Smith certain materials for a solvent recovery system to be installed by Smith on the property in which Smith held a leasehold interest. Chempro (a New Jersey Corp.) issued its purchase order to Aircon (an Ohio Corp.) for a carbon adsorbtion unit, a component part of the solvent recovery system. Aircon then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Christy v. Nabholz Supply Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Sweetser Construction Co. v. Newman Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dews v. Halliburton Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Books-A-Million, Inc. v. Arkansas Painting & Specialties Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Atlantic Sea-Con, Ltd. v. Robert Dann Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Ragsdell v. Gazaway Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Ground Zero Construction, Inc. v. Walnut Creek, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API