Legal Opinion
Riley v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 5, 1989No. 67906PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
549 So.2d 673 (1989)
Michael A. RILEY, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 67906.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 5, 1989.
Marc H. Salton, New Port Richey, Milton Hirsch, Miami, and Craig C. Villanti, New Port Richey, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Cloyce L. Mangas, Jr., Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Parker D. Thomson, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, and Candance M. Sunderland and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
BARKETT, Justice.
Michael A. Riley was charged with two controlled substance violations as a result of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · McDONALD; Concurrence · McDONALD.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Florida v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- State v. RileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ClaytonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993