Legal Opinion
Hammond v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 23, 2003No. 02-1002UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company (Pacific Life) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Janet and Daphne Hammond 1 on their claim for breach of contract stemming from a life insurance policy issued to Marjorie Hammond in June of 1997. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
I
Marjorie Hammond (Hammond) applied for a life insurance policy from Pacific Life in January of 1997. The application, for a policy that provided a death benefit of $750,000 with an annual premium of nearly $30,000, comprised two parts. Hammond completed most of “Part I” of the…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States v. Spencer T. MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Levine v. Selective Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1995
- Edna L. Evans v. United Life & Accident Insurance Company, a New Hampshire Corporation, Edna L. Evans v. United Life & Accident Insurance Company, a New Hampshire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Fisette v. Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance v. HahnDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004