Legal Opinion

United Life & Accident Insurance v. North Atlantic Securities Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The rule that the plaintiff in a bill of interpleader has no interest beyond obtaining a decree that the bill has been properly filed (Barrett v. Cady, 78 N. H. 60, 63; Farley v. Blood, 30 N. H. 354, 363, 364) presupposes that the court has jurisdiction of the contending claimants. It is a fundamental principle of law that every person has a right to insist that a judgment or decree to which he is a party shall have all the attributes of a judicial determination.

The defendants’ contention that after the decree the plaintiff had no standing to object need not be considered, since the question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. CadySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  2. Governor & Council v. MoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewellyn v. FollansbeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  2. Bisson v. GosselinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API