Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Shiomoto

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided January 12, 2017No. E064252Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcKINSTER, J.

I

INTRODUCTION

Bernice Espinoza appeals from the denial of her petition for writ of administrative mandate challenging the one-year suspension of her driver's license by the Department of Motor Vehicles (Department). We conclude the record supports the trial court's implied findings that (1) Espinoza was lawfully arrested on reasonable cause to believe she had been driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), (2) Espinoza refused to submit to and failed to complete a chemical test as required under the implied *625consent law, and (3) Espinoza was afforded a fair hearing before the Department.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API