Legal Opinion

Snyder County v. Wagenseller

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 16, 1917No. Appeal, No. 14Published

Appeal, No. 14, March T., 1917, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Snyder Co., Dec. T., 1915, No. 17, for plaintiff on case stated in suit of Snyder County to use of Selinsgrove Borough v. George C. Wagenseller. Case stated to determine right to retain certain money in hands of county treasurer. The court in an opinion by Johnson, P. J., entered judgment for plaintiff for $48. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Orlady, P. J.,

The appellant frankly concedes that the question involved in this case has been decided by this court against his contention, in Kittanning Borough v. Mast, 15 Pa. Superior Ct. 51, and has been followed in Allentown v. Hartman, 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 400; Lehigh Co. v. Gossler, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 406; Stroudsburg Boro. v. Shick, 24 Pa. Superior Ct. 442; but urges that these cases were erroneously decided and should be overruled.

We have carefully gone over the arguments presented, and find nothing therein to change our views from those expressed in the cases cited, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kittanning Borough v. MastSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Lehigh County v. GosslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Stroudsburg Borough v. ShickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Allentown v. HartmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API