de Riesthal v. Walton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtIrving, J.
The appellants instituted attachment proceedings in the Court of Common Pleas of Baltimore City against the Cleveland Non-Explosive Lamp Company to recover ($5850) five thousand eight hundred and fifty dollars, and laid their attachment in the hands of sundry garnishees in the City of Baltimore who were indebted to “The Cleveland Non-Explosive Lamp Company.” Both the plaintiffs and the debtor were non-residents of the State. The appellee, claiming to he assignee of the “Cleveland Non-Explosive Lamp Company,” appeared and claimed to he entitled to the funds attached; and moved to quash the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thos. Wilson & Co. v. Thos. J. Carson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
- Gardner v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Dulany v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1790
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fowler v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Smith v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- State ex rel. Cotonio v. Judge Criminal District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901