Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maronda Homes, Inc. v. Lakeview Reserve Homeowners Ass'n

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 11, 2013No. Nos. SC10-2292, SC10-2336Published

1DissentCanady, J.

Because the majority decision in this case unduly expands the scope of the common-law implied warranty of habitability enjoyed by purchasers of new homes and disregards the Legislature’s primacy in making public policy, I dissent.

In the decision under review, the Fifth District Court held that implied warranties of fitness and habitability applied to “essential services” affecting the habitability of a residence, a list including roads, drainage systems, and other off-site improvements in common areas. See Lakeview Reserve Homeowners v. Maronda Homes, Inc., 48 So.3d 902, 908. Prior to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. University of Miami v. EcharteSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Lakeview Reserve Homeowners v. Maronda Homes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API