Legal Opinion
Dorsey v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of Worcester, Mass.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 17, 1964No. Civ. A. 8173PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, District Judge.
Defendant State Mutual Life Assurance Co., of Worcester, Mass, (hereinafter called State Mutual) has filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon the grounds that there is no dispute as to any material fact in the case at hand. Thereafter, the plaintiffs, Sam Adams Dorsey and the Citizens and Southern National Bank, Executors to the estate of Roby Robinson, likewise filed a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon the same ground.
Both parties rely upon attached affidavits, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terminal Taxicab Co. v. KutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Reed v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Marcardier v. Chesapeake InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Float-Away Door Company and National Surety Company v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Miller v. INDIANA INSURANCE COMPANIESCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Port Chester Electrical Construction Corporation v. Hbe Corporation and the Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Cesaroni v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1985
- State Mutual Life Assurance Co. v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.