Legal Opinion
Bannister v. Board of County Commissioners
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided August 31, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-2345-GTVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Louise Bannister filed a complaint in this court on August 19,1993, alleging that the drug testing policy of the defendant Board of County Commissioners of Leavenworth County, Kansas, is unconstitutional as applied to her. Plaintiff brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and seeks injunctive relief, back pay and benefits for the time period when plaintiff was suspended without pay from her position as secretary to the Leavenworth County Council on Aging for refusing to submit to a drug test, other monetary damages, a declaration that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gte Corporation v. David R. Williams, D/B/A General TelephoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Watson v. SextonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Federation of Teachers v. Kanawha County Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
- Hamlyn v. Rock Island County Metropolitan Mass Transit DistrictDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997
- Lebron v. WilkinsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2011
- American Federation of State County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 79 v. ScottDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.