Legal Opinion

Sebastian Rako v. VMware LLC, et al.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 13, 2026No. 5:25-cv-05142Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SEBASTIAN RAKO, Case No. 25-cv-05142-SVK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION 9 v. TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT 10 VMWARE LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 101 11 Defendants. 12 On November 25, 2025, the Court granted-in-part and denied-in-part (without prejudice) 13 Defendants’ motions to dismiss the original complaint in this case and granted Plaintiff Sebastian 14 Rako leave to amend certain causes of action. Dkt. 66. Plaintiff thereafter filed a First Amended 15 Complaint. Dkt. 67 – the “FAC”. On May 12, 2026, the Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Badose v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API