Legal Opinion

Scugoza v. Stockton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 15, 1979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

166 N.J. Super. 122 (1979)

399 A.2d 299

JOSEPH SCUGOZA, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ROBERT H. STOCKTON AND BEATRICE J. STOCKTON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 16, 1979.

Decided February 15, 1979.

Before Judges FRITZ, BISCHOFF and MORGAN.

Mr. Robert H. Stockton, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Roger M. Kahn argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Aronsohn, Kahn & Springstead, attorneys).

2Per curiam

We are satisfied that the issues presented in this appeal from a judgment of the county district court for possession in a tenancy matter are without merit…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BranamSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. 447 ASSOCIATES v. MirandaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. A.P. Development Corp. v. BandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  3. 534 Hawthorne Ave. Corp. v. BarnesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API