Legal Opinion

Waterman v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 2, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Howard Circuit Court. Action to foreclose two mortgages. Decree for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtServers, J.

Cyrus and Elizabeth Baldwin, husband and wife, in January, 1879, executed to Ebenezer Baldwin a conveyance, which recites that 'said Cyrus and Elizabeth are indebted to divers persons in considerable sums of money, which they at present are unable to pay in full, and they are desirous to convey all their property for the benefit of all their creditors, without preference or priority. “ Now, the *257said Cyrus and Elizabeth, in consideration of the premises, and of one dollar paid to them by Ebenezer Baldwin, hereby sell, assign, grant and convey unto the said Ebenezer all then-lands, tenements,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newman v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Babcock v. HoeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
  3. Wayne v. MyddletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Campbell v. LowNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Colesbury v. DartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Warren v. PazoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. DonahoeSuperior Court of Delaware · 1901
  3. Lueft v. LueftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Steinke v. YetzerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  5. Wehrman v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API