Krzywoszynski v. Consolidated Gas Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank Krzywoszynski, an infant, by Theodore Krzywoszynski, his guardian ac! litepi, from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 2d day of November, 1895, upon the dismissal of the complaint directed by the court after a trial before the court and a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 10th day of December, 1895, denying…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff, Frank Krzywoszynski, an infant, by Theodore Krzywoszynski, his guardian ac! litepi, from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city of New York in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 2d day of November, 1895, upon the dismissal of the complaint directed by the court after a trial before the court and a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 10th day of December, 1895, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Patterson, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant. upon the dismissal of the complaint at the trial in the Superior Coiirt, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, which injuries were caused by an explosion of illuminating gas which took ¡dace at the premises No. 112 Eldridge street, in the city of NeW York, on the 18th day of May, 1892, the allegation of the complaint being that the explosion occurred in consequence of the negligence of the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Doster v. Binghamton Gas WorksNew York County Court, Broome County · 1950
- Cohen v. Consolidated Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Pernick v. Central Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918