Legal Opinion
Church v. Boylston & Woodbury Cafe Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 15, 1914PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The plaintiff’s intestate, George W. MacDonald, by a writ dated March 7, 1910, brought an action in the Superior Court for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by him by reason of the negligence of the defendant.
MacDonald died during the pendency of the action, and the plaintiff was duly appointed administratrix of his estate and, having suggested his death, entered her appearance in the case and filed a motion to amend the declaration by adding a count in which she seeks to recover for the death of her intestate under R. L. c. 171, § 2, St. 1907, c. 375. The motion to amend has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cripps's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Herlihy v. LittleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Strout v. United Shoe Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Tracy v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Polvere v. Hugh Nawn Contracting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Clark v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Maker v. BouthierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Shapiro v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Sterling v. Frederick Leyland & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Urban v. Central Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.