Legal Opinion

Murray v. Rubenstein

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided November 29, 2017No. 2:13-cv-15798Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION GARLAND MURRAY, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-15798 RUSSELL MATHENEY, et al., MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is Defendants’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony from Plaintiff Regarding his Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Prior to the Filing of the Instant Action [ECF No. 302]. The plaintiff filed a Response [ECF No. 303]. The matter is now ripe for adjudication. For the following reasons, the Motion is DENIED. I. Brief Factual and Procedural Background On June 26,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Pavey v. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Robert Small v. WhittickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Dillon v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API