Legal Opinion

Moore v. Navassa Guano Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1902PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ActioN by Francis M. Moore against the Navassa Guano Company, heard by Judge Thos. A. McNeill and a jury, at September Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of BRuNswick County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFurches, C. J.

The Court being of opinion that the defendant’s challenge to the array (which is defendant’s first assignment of error) should be sustained, no other exception will be considered.

The defendant’s challenge and motion to dismiss the panel is based on two affidavits — one by O. E. Taylor, Register of Deeds and Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners, and the- affidavit of T. L. Vines. The Judge finds but one fact: “That the Commissioners in drawing the jury, and in acting as set out in the affidavits, did not have any corrupt intent, and counsel for defendant in arguing on the challenge,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney General Ex Rel. Boyer v. TeagueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . HensleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  3. State v. SmarrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. Hatton Perry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. State v. . HaywoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. . LevySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. State v. Teachey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. State v. . DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. State v. Dixon.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API