Legal Opinion
Carl Zeiss Vision, Inc. v. REFAC Holdings, Inc. and U.S. Vision, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided August 24, 2017No. CA 11513-VCSPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARL ZEISS VISION, INC. : : Plaintiff, : : v. : C.A. No. 11513-VCS : REFAC HOLDINGS, INC. and : U.S. VISION, INC., : : Defendants. : : REFAC HOLDINGS, INC. and : U.S. VISION, INC., : : Counterclaim Plaintiffs, : : v. : : CARL ZEISS VISION, INC., : : Counterclaim Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION Date Submitted: June 14, 2017 Date Decided: August 24, 2017 Gregory E. Stuhlman, Esquire of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware and Jeff E. Scott, Esquire and Valerie W. Ho, Esquire of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Los Angeles, California, Attorneys…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- GMG Capital Investments, LLC v. Athenian Venture Partners ISupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Brentwood Medical Associates v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Ids Life Insurance Company and American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. v. Royal Alliance Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- John Sutter v. Oxford Health PlansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United Transportation Union Local 1589 v. Suburban Transit Corp. Suburban Transit Corp., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey v. United Transportation Union Local 1589, Afl-Cio. United Transportation Union Local 1589Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.