Legal Opinion

Orelli v. Ambro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 9, 1976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

The plaintiffs commenced this action seeking to recover damages for breach of a contract for the sale of real property or, in the alternative, for specific performance of the contract. They appeal from an order of the Special Term which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied their application for like relief. We reverse.

The facts are not in dispute. In accordance with a duly adopted resolution of the defendant Town Board of the Town of Huntington (Town Board), legal notice was given that the town deemed it in the public interest to dispose of the subject property, "for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  3. Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Grad v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Lowe v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Municipal Consultants & Publishers, Inc. v. Town of RamapoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. De Paola v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Buffalo & Fort Erie Public Bridge Authority v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API