Grant v. Hamm
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.
[¶ 1] Jessica L. Hamm appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Waterville, Dow, J.) awarding sole parental rights and responsibilities of the parties’ daughter to Budd P. Grant. See 19-A M.R.S. § 1653 (2011). Hamm argues that the court abused its discretion by relying largely on its determination that she willfully misused the protection from abuse process, 19-A M.R.S. § 1653(3)(0), to the exclusion of other best interest factors and without making adequate findings. We affirm the judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶2] Budd Grant and Jessica Hamm are the parents of a three-year-old daughter. They…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nadeau v. NadeauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Ezell v. LawlessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Coppola v. CoppolaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
- In re Jacob C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- In Re Alivia B.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Matthew W. Pitts v. Amanda M. MooreSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Christine v. Violette v. Randy R. VioletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Heidi Vibert v. Antonios N. DimoulasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Arn H. Pearson v. Mary Lou WendellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Elena Wechsler v. John P. SimpsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.