Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Klebanov
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 26, 2006Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
902 A.2d 873 (2006)
188 N.J. 23
Craig S. MARSHALL, Administrator Ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Ellen S. Marshall, deceased, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Vladimir KLEBANOV, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued April 3, 2006.
Decided July 26, 2006.
Alan J. Baratz, Parsippany, argued the cause for appellant (Weiner Lesniak, attorneys; Mr. Baratz and Adam Kenny, on the briefs).
Alex Lyubarsky, Woodbridge, argued the cause for respondent (Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Barry A. Cooke, of counsel).
2Opinion of the Court · ZazzaliJustice Zazzali
In this appeal, the Court must decide whether the statutory immunity…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Hubbard Ex Rel. Hubbard v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.