Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. . Smathers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Garber, J., at May Term, 1914, of Haywood. These are three actions brought by the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Canton Cooperative Company, against W. M. Smathers, M. Y. Moore, and George J. Williamson, severally and respectively, to recover the amount of the subscription made by each of them to the said company.

Read the full summary

Appeal by plaintiff from Garber, J., at May Term, 1914, of Haywood. These are three actions brought by the plaintiff, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Canton Cooperative Company, against W. M. Smathers, M. Y. Moore, and George J. Williamson, severally and respectively, to recover the amount of the subscription made by each of them to the said company. It was agreed that they should be heard together, and “any necessary and pertinent facts which are not expressed in the stipulation between the parties shall be found by the court without a jury.” The stipulation mentioned above is as follows:…

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, J.,

after stating the case: It may be said, imprimis, that we are concluded by the findings of the judge as to the facts, and can only review his conclusions of law therefrom, there being evidence to support the findings of fact, and no incompetent evidence, duly objected to, having been heard. Branton v. O’Briant, 93 N. C., 99 ; Shoaf v. Frost, 127 N. C., 306; Travers v. Deaton, 107 N. C., 500; Matthews v. Fry, 143 N. C., 384.

It seems to us that the findings of fact are a complete answer to the plaintiff’s contentions. The proposition cannot be gainsaid that M. Y. Moore & Co.*had the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Hawkins v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Farrington v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Birtha v. Stonemor, North Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Hardin v. York Memorial ParkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Hill v. . Lumber CoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Vaughan-Robertson Drug Co. v. Grimes-Mills Drug Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Thompson v. . ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API