Kristian v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge. *
Appellant Jan-Harlan Kristian, a prisoner of respondent State Department of Corrections, petitioned for an injunction prohibiting application of a new prison policy limiting his rights to possess property, arguing that the policy is unconstitutional on the grounds that it (1) denies his right of access to the courts, (2) unduly burdens his free speech rights, (3) is not reasonably related to legitimate penal interests, and (4) is arbitrary and capricious as written and employed. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Department of Corrections on all…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Block v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Mitchell v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012