Legal Opinion
Durst v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided June 11, 1919No. 5410PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
conviction was for assault and battery. The appeal must be dismissed for want of a sufficient recognizance. The statute requires the recognizance must set out in the face of it the amount of punishment assessed against appellant. This recognizance fails to do this.
The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.
Dismissed.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Hamlin v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Culpepper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Younger Bros., Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939