Legal Opinion

American Petroleum Co. v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 1, 1927No. 28PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The suits arose out of the collision between the Rotterdam and the Tampico, which occurred at about 4 o’clock on the afternoon of Juno 30, 1921, in the Sabine-Neehes Canal, at a point opposite the upper part of the city of Port Arthur, above the bridge known as the “Pleasure Bridge.” The trial court found that the place of collision was at a point about a mile and a half north of the Pleasure Pier bridge, which was a drawbridge across the canal.

The steamship Rotterdam is a bulk tank steamer, 360 feet long, 46.7 feet in beam, which at the time of the collision…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Queen CityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1910
  2. Emery v. The OsceolaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Klapholz v. EsperdyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  2. Reiss Steamship Company, Libelant-Appellee v. Compagnia Fletera Cajotamil, S. A., Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. Standard Vacuum Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
  4. Boyer v. The Tanker Seneca SunDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API