Legal Opinion

Barbour Asphalt Paving Co. v. Griffin Roofing Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1914Published

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of New York denying defendant’s motion for a new trial after judgment had been directed against it upon a trial before the court and a jury. Defendant does not appeal from the judgment.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, J.

The plaintiff is a foreign corporation duly authorized to transact business in the state of New York. Defendant is a domestic corporation with its main office in Manhattan, New York city.

On September 20, 1907, defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $769.61, for goods sold and delivered, In October, 1907, the Rhode Island Contract *81Engineering Company (a Rhode Island corporation) was indebted to the defendant in the snm of $619.61.

In the month of October, 1907, the plaintiff instituted a suit against this defendant in the Superior Court of Rhode Island, which is a court of general…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunstan v. . HigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Schwabe v. HerzogAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API