Legal Opinion

United States v. Arcadio Hernandez

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 2014No. 13-2879PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Arcadio Hernandez was convicted by a jury of possessing a gun as a felon. He had confessed to knowingly possessing a gun, and the jury was so told over his objection. He argues that his confession should have been suppressed because it was obtained by a two-step interrogation process that circumvented Miranda. The district court disagreed, finding that the “interrogation” that took place before he was given Miranda warnings did not circumvent Miranda under the Supreme Court’s jurisprudence. We affirm, but on the alternative basis that the single question asked before…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Mohammad KhanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  2. State v. WidmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2020
  3. United States v. Joshua WoolridgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. HicksDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016
  5. People of Michigan v. Scott Jeffray DemingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API