Legal Opinion

In re Bell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 28, 1991No. 23406PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

A complaint was filed in this attorney grievance matter alleging that respondent committed various acts of professional misconduct. Respondent has conditionally admitted certain allegations and consents to a public reprimand. We accept the conditional admission and publicly reprimand respondent.

Respondent conditionally admits he negligently failed to maintain proper book-keeping practices in his office and negligently failed to properly supervise his staff. Because of this negligence, client funds were not timely disbursed and expenses were incorrectly posted to client accounts. Respondent is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In re BowenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. WrightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API