Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Banas v. Matthews International Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1985No. 01205Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeck, J.

Factual Background

Bañas began his employment with Matthews as a sandblaster (Record at 6a) and advanced to the position of tooler, which he held for 14 or 15 years preceding his discharge (Record at 17a). It was undisputed that Bañas was a skilled craftsman and his job performance was good (Record at 120a). In fact, Bañas had been selected to work on an important job for Matthews, the making of Elvis Presley’s grave marker (Record at 19-20a).

After he was hired, Bañas received from Matthews a copy of a booklet entitled “Matthews — You and Your Company.” This employee handbook contained the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API