Legal Opinion

Shafto v. O'Brien

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 17, 1935PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to recover a deficiency after a mortgage foreclosure, in which the original mortgagors and their assuming grantees are named as defendants. The mortgagors contend that the complainants, assignors of the mortgagee, have an adequate remedy at law against the mortgagors and that this court has no jurisdiction.

It is, of course, well settled that in the ordinary case where a mortgagor has conveyed to a grantee who assumes the mortgage, the assuming grantee in equity becomes the principal debtor and the mortgagor merely a surety.

Uptown Building and Loan Association v. Leff, 112 N.J.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  2. Uptown Bldg., C., Newark v. LeffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Meyer v. SupinskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API