Legal Opinion

People v. Kane

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1899Published

Demurrer to indictment.

1Opinion of the CourtJenks, J.

The stress of counsel in argument and in brief is upoh the alleged duplicity, and therefore I shall consider first the grounds of the objection that three separate and distinct crimes, namely, violation of law, evasion of law, and fraud, are charged in the single count of this indictment. The fact that the statute is expressed in disjunctives, while the indictment employs conjunctives,—violating “ and ” evading “ and ” committing a fraud,—is not fatal. Aside from the grave question whether a statutory misdemeanor can be charged in the disjunctive, it is clear that a charge in the form…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People v. . DumarNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Harris v. . WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Fleming v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Upton v. VailNew York Supreme Court · 1810

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API