Ehrlich v. Mangicapra

OPINION ON REHEARING

ANSTEAD, Judge.

We grant appellant’s motion for rehearing and now reverse.

Appellant, Abraham Ehrlich, held a mortgage executed by both appellees, Raymond (Raymond) and Diane (Diane) Mangi-capra.1 The mortgage secured payment of a promissory note executed by Raymond but not by Diane. Ehrlich sought to foreclose the mortgage, and also to have Diane held personally hable on the balance due on the note based on a covenant in the mortgage which provides:

And the mortgagor hereby farther covenants and agrees to pay promptly when due the principal and interest and other sums of…