Legal Opinion

People v. Fuhrer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 6, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court’s determination that the statements defendant made to the police were voluntary is supported by the record. Defendant does not challenge the admissions he made at the scene of the accident prior to being advised of his Miranda rights. These investigatory inquiries did not constitute custodial interrogation to which Miranda v Arizona (384 US 436) applies (People v Bennett, 70 NY2d 891, 893; People v Sullivan, 149 AD2d 968). With respect to defendant’s other admissions made at the hospital after he had been advised of his Miranda…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. HallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. People v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. JohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API