Patterson v. State

Patterson seeks review of the denial of his motion for postconviction relief. Patterson raises three claims to support his motion, tVo of which have merit. We therefore reverse, in part, the denial of the motion and remand for further proceedings.

Patterson first contends that the trial court failed to honor his plea agreement. Specifically, he argues that the trial court orally agreed that his sentence would run concurrent with the prison term imposed *85for a crime committed in Texas. Patterson further argues that the trial judge ruled that he may serve his sentence in the Texas prison where he…