Legal Opinion

Poole v. Poole

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 14, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The defendant on her appeal to this Court relies chiefly on her contention that there was error in the refusal of the trial court to sustain her plea in abatement on the ground that since the commencement of the action the original defendant, H. S. Poole, has died, and that at the date of his death “he had no property in his name.” The plea in abatement was filed after the defendant had been allowed to intervene in the action, on the ground that as the widow of H. S. Poole she had an interest in the property, real and personal, which he owned at his death. After she had been made a party…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Fowler v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Ins. Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Fort v. . PennySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Honig v. . HawaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Thomas v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Patrick v. PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. In Re the Estate of SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API