Legal Opinion
Maressa v. A.H. Robins Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1988No. 87-1041PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
A.H. Robins Company, Inc. appeals the order of the district court granting Wilma M. Maressa leave to file a proof of claim subsequent to the bar date of April 30, *2211986 set by the court. At the hearing on Maressa’s motion for relief from the bar date pursuant to Local Rule 7(f) and Rules 60(b) and 55(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court found that excusable neglect was not established. Nevertheless, the court held that
justice requires that we permit the filing of the claim. Robins had notice of it. There was a lawsuit pending. I don’t think it sets any precedent except as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hoos & Co., Claimant-Appellant v. Dynamics Corporation of America, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
3Cited by36 opinions
- In Re John R. Kolstad, Debtor. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) v. John R. KolstadCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- In Re Best Products Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Menard-Sanford v. Mabey (In re A.H. Robins Co.)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Nutri Bevco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re Pioneer Investment Services CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.