Legal Opinion

Powell v. Havner

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided March 19, 1993No. 90-2031-JWLPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on defendant’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) (Doc. # 136). In his motion, defendant argues that the evidence presented at trial was not legally sufficient for a jury to find that defendant’s conduct caused plaintiff damages or that defendant acted in a wanton manner, justifying an award of punitive damages. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted as to the punitive damage issue and denied as to the causation issue.

In this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motive Parts Warehouse v. Facet EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Penn Square Bank, N.A. v. Myron J. PalermoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Baker v. City of Garden CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  4. Hedgepeth v. Fruehauf Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1986
  5. Stevens v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hasselman v. HasselmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  2. Stewart v. Mitchell TransportDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. Messer v. Amway Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  4. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Chrysler Realty Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  5. Preston v. Income Producing Management, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API