Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1935No. 23794PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The alleged facts proffered for a basis for this action were that in the year. 1927. the county court of .Osage county, in a guardianship cause there pending, ordered the guardian, Leahy, since deceased, to pay plaintiff, out of assets of the estate of his ward, the amount due on a promissory note executed by the ward prior to his adjudicated incompeteney and assigned by payee to plaintiff, Mitchell, shortly subsequent to a similar order of the same county court made and entered in the year 1924, which directed the then guardian to pay said note. It was alleged that the guardian, Leahy, paid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Donnell v. DansbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. LangleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. American Surety Co. of New York v. SteenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Southern Surety Co. v. HatchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. In Re EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. St. Mary's HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API