Legal Opinion

Oar v. Davis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1912No. 2269PublishedCited by 59 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fifth District, in an appeal from Hunt County. Myrtie Davis and others sued Oar and wife and recovered judgment. Defendants appealed and on affirmance obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibrell

This was a suit begun in the District Court of Hunt County by J. C. Davis and Myrtie and Ella Davis joined by their husbands, Lee and J. F. Davis, against R. V. Oar and wife, M. A. Oar, to cancel so much of three deeds as conveyed a certain tract of 100 acres of land out of the Donelly survey, in Hunt County, said deeds having been executed by plaintiffs to the defendant, R. V. Oar. These deeds conveyed other lands against which no relief is sought. Earl C. Davis intervened, claiming an interest in the property the subject of litigation, and about his claim there was no controversy.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Hartley v. FroshTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Brand v. Colorado Salt Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Dean v. LyonsTexas Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. DunlopTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Miller v. Miller, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Hovey v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Robertson v. VernonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  5. Atkins v. DoddsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API