Legal Opinion · Dissent

The People v. William Brown / The People v. Patrick Thomas

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2015No. 36 / 37Published

1DissentPigott, J.

Although determinations as to reasonable suspicion typically present a mixed question of law and fact, where the issue presented involves the “minimum showing necessary to establish” reasonable suspicion, “a question of law is presented for [our] review” (People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 601 [1980]). Here,.the Appellate Division erred as a matter of law in holding that the undisputed facts and the reasonable inferences drawn therefrom failed to satisfy the minimum showing necessary to establish reasonable suspicion. Therefore, I dissent and would reverse the order of the Appellate Division and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. ChestnutNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. SierraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API