Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Haines
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to'the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
This was an action upon an oral contract to insure against burglary. There are two classes of such insurance. One consists of the insurance of personal property while in á safe, and is denominated safe-burglary insurance, while the other comprises the insurance of such property when it is not within a safe, and is called store or residence burglary insurance. The rates and contracts of the two classes of insurance differ. The controversy here arises over an alleged oral agreement to make a contract of safe-burglary insurance whose existence was' denied by the company.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- National Masonic Acc. Ass'n of Des Moines v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- New York Life Insurance v. McMasterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Adams v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Briggs v. John Yeon Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. KendallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. RankinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Northern Central Coal Co. v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.