Legal Opinion

Parker v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 27, 2003No. SC01-1013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

843 So.2d 871 (2003)

Thomas PARKER, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. SC01-1013.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 27, 2003.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Celia Terenzio, Bureau Chief, West Palm Beach, and Maria J. Patullo, Joseph A. Tringali, and Leslie T. Campbell, Assistant Attorneys General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Respondent.

SHAW, Senior Justice.

We have for review Parker v. State, 780 So.2d 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), wherein the district court expressly declared valid a state statute. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Parker was…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Pariente; Concurrence · Anstead.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Bernhardt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  5. Department of Law Enf. v. Real PropertySupreme Court of Florida · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State of Tennessee v. Latickia Tashay BurginsTennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Neeld v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  4. Blair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Resendes v. BradshawDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API