Legal Opinion

Tharpe v. Crumpler

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 15, 1879PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Judgments. Practice in the Superior Court. Minutes. Before Judge Fate. Dooly Superior Court. March Term, 1879. Report unnecessary.

1Opinion of the Court

Bleckley, Justice.

Several points are in the record, but only one was argued and insisted upon. The judgment was one which, under the constitution, the court was competent to render without the aid of a jury. It was regularly entered on the minutes as a part of the proceedings of the day; and after the day’s proceedings as a whole, the minutes were duly signed by the presiding judge. Certainly the 38th rule of court contemplates that be shall sign eacli judgment separately, but the omission is a mere irregularity, and is curable by amendment. If the actual rendition of the judgment is duly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pollard v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  2. Jones v. WordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sullivan v. Douglas Gibbons Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API