Legal Opinion

Beardsley v. . American Bonding Company of Baltimore

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We think the defendant has been improperly credited with payments made before September 7, 1909, to sub-brokers employed by plaintiff’s firm, and also for the firm’s office expenses.

The plaintiff’s recovery should, therefore, be increased by adding thereto the sum of $1,120.14.

As so modified, the judgment should be affirmed, without costs to either party as against the other.

Hiscock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984