Savarese v. Schoner
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCampbell, Judge
I concur completely with affirming the refusal of the court below in refusing to order a foreclosure because the default was technical and the result would be unjust.
*697I dissent from the majority in its reversal of the denial of attorney’s fees below. I believe where the court below finds that to allow foreclosure as a remedy for a technical default would be “unconscionable,” it follows that to allow attorney’s fees for bringing that “unconscionable” foreclosure action is likewise unconscionable.
While I agree that attorney’s fees are sometimes found appropriate even when foreclosure is denied,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schechtman v. GrobbelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Maw v. AbinalesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Rice v. CampisiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
- Rockwood v. DeRosaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973