Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rousseau v. Baudoin

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1925No. 9963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

Plaintiffs herein applied for a writ of mandamus directed to Irby T. Baudouin, the Clerk and to J. J. Carbrey, the Stenographer of the Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court of the Parish of St. Charles, in order to compel these officials to file immediately all testimony taken in the case of Theodule Rousseau et al. vs. Texas & Pacific Railway Company et al. No. 1332 of the docket of the said Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court upon payment of the fees for transcription of testimony as fixed by Act 69 of 1900.

The law relative to the employment of shorthand reporters, outside of the Parish…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Macready v. SchenckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  3. Parish of St. Helena v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. State ex rel. Blum v. WellsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. AntoineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Palmer v. Wyatt Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API