People Ex Rel. Jones v. Savage
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
WARD, J., Dissenting.
I dissent.
The majority opinion directs a reversal of the judgment with instructions to grant appellant’s motion to dismiss. The conclusion is based upon two grounds: that as a matter of legal right appellant was entitled to a dismissal, and that the finding that the children were destitute is contrary to undisputed facts.
It is not held that the motion to dismiss should be granted as a matter of law, except as stated, “that under the circumstances appearing in the record, appellant, as a matter of legal right was entitled to a dismissal.” The only “circumstances” referred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re GilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- In Re HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- In Re JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- In Re EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- In Re StrattonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.