Johnson v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Friedman, J.(dissenting in part).
I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in failing to submit to the jury the issue of plaintiffs comparative negligence. In my view, however, *330at the new trial to be held on remand, both defendant’s liability and plaintiffs comparative negligence should be at issue. That is to say, one jury should consider, afresh and in a single deliberation, each party’s responsibility, if any, for the accident. The previous jury’s determination of defendant’s liability, rendered without consideration of plaintiffs conduct, should play no role. Where fault must…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hecht v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Thoma v. RonaiNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Oden v. Chemung County Industrial Development AgencyNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Andy Associates, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- MATTER OF STARNELLA v. BrattonNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.