Legal Opinion

American Heritage Bank and Trust Co. v. Isaac

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1981No. 79CA0826PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, American Heritage Bank & Trust Co., (the bank) and defendant James B. Isaac, individually and doing business as Cash Cattle Co., a partnership, both appeal a judgment in favor of the bank in the amount of $17,764.77. Though judgment was also entered against defendant Mike Sadler, he has not appealed. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The following facts are not disputed. Defendants Isaac and Sadler formed a partnership under the name of Cash Cattle Co. for the purpose of buying and selling cattle. On June 30, 1977, as partners, they executed a note payable to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. Marcoux v. Van WykCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  3. Brickell v. First National BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Dinerman v. National Bank of North AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Medford Irrigation District v. Western BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Isaac v. American Heritage Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. American Heritage Bank and Trust Co. v. IsaacColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Medford Irrigation District v. Western BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API