Legal Opinion

Riggs Optical Co. v. Riggs

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1937No. 29797PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal from a decree permanently enjoining^ Dr. Earl F. Riggs, a licensed optometrist, from the use in advertising of the names Dr. Riggs or Dr. Earl F. Riggs of the Riggs Optical Company, or the Dr. Earl F. Riggs / Optical Company.

The plaintiff, the Riggs Optical Company, is a corporation organized for the purpose of manufacturing and selling optical goods. It manufactures eyeglasses according to prescriptions of oculists, optometrists, and refractionists and sells them to the public. The petition alleges that the Riggs Optical Company has been engaged in such manufacture and sale…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Selby v. MatsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Atlas Assurance Co. v. Atlas InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Regent Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. HaakerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Weisman v. KuschewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Skinner Mfg. Co. v. General Foods Sales Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1943
  2. Morton Buildings of Nebraska, Inc. v. Morton Buildings, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1971
  3. Personal Finance Co. v. Personal Loan ServiceNebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Belitz v. SuhrNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Peterson & Co. v. JayNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API